It's past my bedtime.
Aug. 1st, 2006 01:55 amEither you like a shoe, or you don't. Either you think it looks good on you, or you don't. Either you can buy the pair, or you can't. If you have the shoes, and one day you decide you don't like them anymore, you can give them away, sell them, or discard them.
It's so nice and simple. There is no fear, no uncertainty, no ambiguity, no real-life problem involved. A shoe can stroke your ego, but it can't really put you down, because you wouldn't wear a shoe that did that.
.....
A shoe can look great, but hurt your feet. Is that a real problem? No, that's just you being dumb. Find a shoe that looks good and treats you right.
This metaphor sucks, and I need an uncommonly good fuck.
Edit: For the sake of clarity, I divided this entry (.....) at the point where I moved from contrasting people/relationships and shoes to comparing them (poorly). I didn't intend to draw parallels initially, but I drifted in that direction. That's probably why the change threw people off. Anyway, I'm doing this after the fortieth comment, so it probably won't make a difference to anyone but me.
It's so nice and simple. There is no fear, no uncertainty, no ambiguity, no real-life problem involved. A shoe can stroke your ego, but it can't really put you down, because you wouldn't wear a shoe that did that.
.....
A shoe can look great, but hurt your feet. Is that a real problem? No, that's just you being dumb. Find a shoe that looks good and treats you right.
This metaphor sucks, and I need an uncommonly good fuck.
Edit: For the sake of clarity, I divided this entry (.....) at the point where I moved from contrasting people/relationships and shoes to comparing them (poorly). I didn't intend to draw parallels initially, but I drifted in that direction. That's probably why the change threw people off. Anyway, I'm doing this after the fortieth comment, so it probably won't make a difference to anyone but me.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 06:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 10:34 am (UTC)-PT
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 12:48 pm (UTC)I feel the need to take issue with the "shoes that hurt" bit, however. That's not necessarily stupidity. Sometimes that's just wanting to look wicked fucking hot, toes be damned. I don't know how that does or doesn't fit with the metaphor, though. :P
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 02:15 pm (UTC)I just had to toss out some of my most treasured but impractical shoes, along with one very practical-but-in-need-of-much-repair pair, and not by choice but by necessity. Literally closet cleaning. No metaphor in there. (Though I suppose anything can be a metaphor if one wants to make it so.)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 07:29 pm (UTC)...because otherwise the metaphor could get out of hand, but I see that its far too late for that, and it already has.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 05:58 pm (UTC)I did say the metaphor sucks. I like "meataphor," though. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 06:16 pm (UTC)1. The ending of this with "I need an uncommonly good fuck" made me think it was about women.
2. I don't care what you need; she's mine.
3. People suck. People are chimps who are good with tools. That is an observation, not a metaphor.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 06:26 pm (UTC)Duly noted!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-02 12:20 am (UTC)what might that be a meataphor for?
It wasn't wearing shoes.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 01:41 pm (UTC)some women in California had some of their toes surgically removed or shortened to fit into smaller high heels.
I thought China did away with footbinding hundreds of years ago?
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9400E0DF133DF934A35751C1A9659C8B63&sec=health&pagewanted=print
I guess it's sort of off topic in a wacky way...
ok I'll shut up now. :P
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 01:46 pm (UTC)If you see a pair of shoes that you like but you don't buy them, and you're still thinking about them three days later, you should go back and buy them.
Apply to non-shoe contexts as you will. ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 02:06 pm (UTC)And yes, also to other things. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-02 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 02:16 pm (UTC)Good luck.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 06:00 pm (UTC)(Or until you do -- whichever comes first.)
Very nice. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 07:37 pm (UTC)I have. Sometimes the cobbling's cost nearly as much as the shoe did, but its always worth it to try.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 08:01 pm (UTC)Must be a sneaker! Wocka-Wocka!
*ba-dump-bump-bump*
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 06:43 pm (UTC)...then those shoes are strung up by their laces from the power lines and hang there, forgotten and replaced by an almost identical pair of high-tops.
(Yup, there's a metaphor that applies to men, too...)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 07:14 pm (UTC);)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-01 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-02 07:33 pm (UTC)Good luck with the fvcking.