two things
Nov. 4th, 2007 11:08 pm1.
Oldboy: Oof. Man, I felt better after watching 21 Grams. At least it wasn't Arlington Road.
2.
Thank you for all the dermestid pointers. I should have specified that I'm looking for a big, established setup, located away from my apartment, that I can use. It is not rad to have a colony of flesh-eating beetles in the house. Dermestid colonies, big or small, stink. I'll look into Hahvahd.
Oldboy: Oof. Man, I felt better after watching 21 Grams. At least it wasn't Arlington Road.
2.
Thank you for all the dermestid pointers. I should have specified that I'm looking for a big, established setup, located away from my apartment, that I can use. It is not rad to have a colony of flesh-eating beetles in the house. Dermestid colonies, big or small, stink. I'll look into Hahvahd.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 03:42 pm (UTC)2. Who are you?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 04:33 pm (UTC)21 Grams
Date: 2007-11-05 02:10 pm (UTC)why is it now considered hip and artsy
to edit a film backwards?
there are times showing a story backwards makes sense.
in Memento a man is piecing together his past from his present.
he -has- to work backwards and so it works.
i've heard radio dramas in which
because characters are following a recently left trail of evidence
from what just occurred back to what happened earlier in the evening
it makes sense to tell the story backwards.
but 21 Grams?
i just spent the whole film wanting the last 5 minutes
because they'd already given away the rest of the film
in the first five minutes.
a film can't be dramatic and gripping
if you already know what is going to happen,
in detail,
straight through.
HAMMERTIME
Date: 2007-11-07 04:01 am (UTC)