Here's the root cause of my frustration with science in the movies: People generally misunderstand how science works to begin with. Movies tell them that more DNA is better. Then people vote on legislation that affects the progress of research and medicine.
I'm not saying films should educate people. It's just not that hard to make something fictional that doesn't anti-educate. Throw in some expository dialogue. Leave out abused technical terms. Confusion and ambiguity are fine.
To exaggerate: If you show people noisy explosions in space, or wizards, it's not likely to affect whether we'll cure Type 1 Diabetes in the next hundred years. Suggest that we can transmogrify people into space-shrimp with prune juice, and it's a wonder we can still get vaccines.
I'm not saying films should educate people. It's just not that hard to make something fictional that doesn't anti-educate. Throw in some expository dialogue. Leave out abused technical terms. Confusion and ambiguity are fine.
To exaggerate: If you show people noisy explosions in space, or wizards, it's not likely to affect whether we'll cure Type 1 Diabetes in the next hundred years. Suggest that we can transmogrify people into space-shrimp with prune juice, and it's a wonder we can still get vaccines.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 01:11 pm (UTC)(LOL!)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 05:51 pm (UTC)The Science & Entertainment Exchange
Date: 2009-08-16 07:05 pm (UTC)Re: The Science & Entertainment Exchange
Date: 2009-08-17 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 08:12 pm (UTC)Jenny McCarthy is working on this.
-PT
no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 08:15 pm (UTC)'Senator Debbie Stabenow (D., Mich.) - recently appointed to the Senate Energy Committee - made clear that fighting the climate crisis is her top priority. "Climate change is very real," she confessed as she embraced cap and trade's massive tax increase on Michigan industry - at the same time claiming, against all the evidence, that it would not lead to an increase in manufacturing costs or energy prices. "Global warming creates volatility. I feel it when I'm flying. The storms are more volatile. We are paying the price in more hurricanes and tornadoes."'
no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 09:09 pm (UTC)http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2009/jun/25/your-guide-cap-and-trade/
The EPA says about 20-30 cents a day for the average American. The independent Congressional Budget Office says an average of 48 cents, though the cost will vary based upon income with wealthy consumers paying up to an extra dollar a day and lower income consumers saving 11 cents a day. Even the conservative Heritage foundation only claims a cost of $3.40 a day.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 09:37 pm (UTC)"Global warming creates volatility. I feel it when I'm flying. The storms are more volatile."
no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 10:03 pm (UTC)In terms of bad science, Senator Stabenow's mistake doesn't even rise to the level of the article you are quoting. The author of your article appears to be a global warming denialist who claims that the cost of cap and trade are massive.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-16 11:06 pm (UTC)But - Lepido's post wasn't primarily referring to vaccination, and I was not suggesting that the dim Senator's comment was comparable in some way to anti-vax ideas. They would be hard to compare, dealing with such different topics. My intended point was that people - including people who make deeply important policy decisions - generally haven't got a clue about how to evaluate evidence.
As for "rising to the level of not vaccinating kids" I'll assume that you refer to extreme anti-vaccination, Jenny McCarthy autism-scare type stuff. But some skepticism about medical establishment recommendations for vaccination is wise. Vaccinations for rubella & polio - yes please. Vaccination at birth against Hepatitis B? Not my kid.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 12:46 pm (UTC)I'll uh, see that they get all punished and stuff for being bad.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 12:39 am (UTC)Of couse, video games have been demonized and grossly misused in movies since the early 80's. My standard of movie accuracy is more or less about tightening up the graphics on level 3.
Billy vs. Goatsucker
Date: 2009-08-17 01:10 am (UTC)They don't owe us an education, for sure, but I doubt they sincerely believe they're not molding public perceptions. I know they're out to make a buck, like everyone else. Accuracy has a limited ROI, so there's a conflict of interest.
video games have been demonized and grossly misused in movies since the early 80's
True, but I think a rudimentary understanding -- or at least a lack of gross distortion -- of Biotechnology would have a more immediate effect on the pace of progress than a deeper appreciation of GTA VII -- Whore Wars. ;)
Re: Billy vs. Goatsucker
Date: 2009-08-17 04:38 am (UTC)Some would argue that culture defines how we contextualize all other forms of humanity, including science. And in that way, the culture wars are very important. Video games are an industry dominated by 20-30 year olds. We lack our Rupert Murdoch ordering game develoeprs to indoctrinate the US in the ways of being conservative bastards. Which is not to say that the Gaming Industry is *right*, or that what we provide is necessarily *informative* either. But it is a medium which we the younger generation do control. And as such, having that medium demonized by the older, established, far more conservative industries is just another way that they can retain control over the cultural framework within which we all view the world.
Re: Billy vs. Goatsucker
Date: 2009-08-17 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 02:34 am (UTC)I also think agendas are more effective when subtly approached rather than when I'm slammed over the head in the first 5 minutes with the Trail of Tears.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 12:44 pm (UTC)I made some of that over vacation. Really good for hiking.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-17 03:28 pm (UTC)I hear you 100% on this. I've read way too many well researched sci-fi novels to tolerate -easily- correctable crap in films. Hollywood -is- lazy and whether it is mindless entertainment or not, they're still -lazy-. And lazy has consequences when you're a multi-billion dollar a year industry.