oy vey

Aug. 16th, 2009 02:56 pm
opabinia: (floor)
[personal profile] opabinia
Here's the root cause of my frustration with science in the movies: People generally misunderstand how science works to begin with. Movies tell them that more DNA is better. Then people vote on legislation that affects the progress of research and medicine.

I'm not saying films should educate people. It's just not that hard to make something fictional that doesn't anti-educate. Throw in some expository dialogue. Leave out abused technical terms. Confusion and ambiguity are fine.

To exaggerate: If you show people noisy explosions in space, or wizards, it's not likely to affect whether we'll cure Type 1 Diabetes in the next hundred years. Suggest that we can transmogrify people into space-shrimp with prune juice, and it's a wonder we can still get vaccines.

Date: 2009-08-16 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bottleimp.livejournal.com
You've been watching "The Relic" again, haven't you?

Date: 2009-08-17 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pat-man-ta.livejournal.com
i love that movie!


(LOL!)

Date: 2009-08-17 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bottleimp.livejournal.com
It is not as much EPIC SCIENCE FAIL as "The Core," but it tries hard.

The Science & Entertainment Exchange

Date: 2009-08-16 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com
There actually are people trying to fix this.
The Science & Entertainment Exchange (http://www.scienceandentertainmentexchange.org/) is a program of the National Academy of Sciences that provides entertainment industry professionals with access to top scientists and engineers to help bring the reality of cutting-edge science to creative and engaging storylines.
The Science & Entertainment Exchange director, Jennifer Ouellette was interviewed on one of the latest Skeptics Guide to the Universe (http://media.libsyn.com/media/skepticsguide/skepticast2009-07-29.mp3) podcasts.

Date: 2009-08-16 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mfree.livejournal.com
Don't forget to cock your glock when you present.

Date: 2009-08-16 11:56 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-08-17 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bottleimp.livejournal.com
And flick off the safety on your revolver.

Date: 2009-08-16 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] popetom.livejournal.com
"and it's a wonder we can still get vaccines."

Jenny McCarthy is working on this.

-PT

Date: 2009-08-16 08:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atalanta.livejournal.com
"People" aren't the only problem. Check out the idiots in charge:

'Senator Debbie Stabenow (D., Mich.) - recently appointed to the Senate Energy Committee - made clear that fighting the climate crisis is her top priority. "Climate change is very real," she confessed as she embraced cap and trade's massive tax increase on Michigan industry - at the same time claiming, against all the evidence, that it would not lead to an increase in manufacturing costs or energy prices. "Global warming creates volatility. I feel it when I'm flying. The storms are more volatile. We are paying the price in more hurricanes and tornadoes."'

Date: 2009-08-16 09:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com
Are you disputing that climate change being real or claiming cap and trade is a "massive tax increase?" I'll assuming for the moment that you aren't a global warming denialist, here is an article that gives estimates for the cost of cap and trade by various organizations who have tried to read the economic tea leaves.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2009/jun/25/your-guide-cap-and-trade/

The EPA says about 20-30 cents a day for the average American. The independent Congressional Budget Office says an average of 48 cents, though the cost will vary based upon income with wealthy consumers paying up to an extra dollar a day and lower income consumers saving 11 cents a day. Even the conservative Heritage foundation only claims a cost of $3.40 a day.

Date: 2009-08-16 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atalanta.livejournal.com
For the purposes of this comment/entry, I'm referring to the dimness of this quote:
"Global warming creates volatility. I feel it when I'm flying. The storms are more volatile."

Date: 2009-08-16 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com
That global warming increase the potential energy of hurricanes is well established. That you can feel the difference comparing turbulence during normal civilian air traffic absurd, but I'm not sure it rises to the level of not vaccinating kids.

In terms of bad science, Senator Stabenow's mistake doesn't even rise to the level of the article you are quoting. The author of your article appears to be a global warming denialist who claims that the cost of cap and trade are massive.
Edited Date: 2009-08-16 10:51 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-08-16 11:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atalanta.livejournal.com
At another time I'd happily have gotten into this with you, but for now your appetite for argument is certainly greater than mine.

But - Lepido's post wasn't primarily referring to vaccination, and I was not suggesting that the dim Senator's comment was comparable in some way to anti-vax ideas. They would be hard to compare, dealing with such different topics. My intended point was that people - including people who make deeply important policy decisions - generally haven't got a clue about how to evaluate evidence.

As for "rising to the level of not vaccinating kids" I'll assume that you refer to extreme anti-vaccination, Jenny McCarthy autism-scare type stuff. But some skepticism about medical establishment recommendations for vaccination is wise. Vaccinations for rubella & polio - yes please. Vaccination at birth against Hepatitis B? Not my kid.

Date: 2009-08-17 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com
To me skepticism means evaluating claims based upon the scientific consensus. Thus I reject astrology because I don't find it taught in psychology departments. As for the Hepatitis B vaccine, it is recommended by The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the American College of Physicians (ACP), and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Are there any scientific or medical organizations of similar caliber that advise against Hepatitis B vaccines?

Date: 2009-08-17 12:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lepidosiren.livejournal.com
I'd better become a priest while there's still time. That way, when we resume burning witches at the stake, I'll be on the right end of the torch.

Date: 2009-08-17 12:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bottleimp.livejournal.com
If you have any pull, remember that if you find any witches who look like Barbara Steele or Caroline Munro, smuggle them out to me.

I'll uh, see that they get all punished and stuff for being bad.

Date: 2009-08-17 12:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seishino.livejournal.com
The entertainment industries don't think that they're educating. They start with some interesting or entertaining disaster. Then they find areas of enough doubt or confusion that they can justify this disaster in the movie. Whichever part of a given production the developers are most interested in, it's almost never about firming up the biology behind genetically mixing goat and shark stem cells to create Goatshark 2: Billy's Back! Movies reflect the intelligence and culture of the time, rather than helping it improve.

Of couse, video games have been demonized and grossly misused in movies since the early 80's. My standard of movie accuracy is more or less about tightening up the graphics on level 3.

Billy vs. Goatsucker

Date: 2009-08-17 01:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lepidosiren.livejournal.com
The entertainment industries don't think that they're educating...

They don't owe us an education, for sure, but I doubt they sincerely believe they're not molding public perceptions. I know they're out to make a buck, like everyone else. Accuracy has a limited ROI, so there's a conflict of interest.

video games have been demonized and grossly misused in movies since the early 80's

True, but I think a rudimentary understanding -- or at least a lack of gross distortion -- of Biotechnology would have a more immediate effect on the pace of progress than a deeper appreciation of GTA VII -- Whore Wars. ;)

Re: Billy vs. Goatsucker

Date: 2009-08-17 04:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seishino.livejournal.com
True, but I think a rudimentary understanding -- or at least a lack of gross distortion -- of Biotechnology would have a more immediate effect on the pace of progress than a deeper appreciation of GTA VII -- Whore Wars. ;)

Some would argue that culture defines how we contextualize all other forms of humanity, including science. And in that way, the culture wars are very important. Video games are an industry dominated by 20-30 year olds. We lack our Rupert Murdoch ordering game develoeprs to indoctrinate the US in the ways of being conservative bastards. Which is not to say that the Gaming Industry is *right*, or that what we provide is necessarily *informative* either. But it is a medium which we the younger generation do control. And as such, having that medium demonized by the older, established, far more conservative industries is just another way that they can retain control over the cultural framework within which we all view the world.

Re: Billy vs. Goatsucker

Date: 2009-08-17 05:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lepidosiren.livejournal.com
Good point. We need advances on both fronts, then!

Date: 2009-08-17 02:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mangokat.livejournal.com
Seriously. I have more chance of turning into an oak tree when an acorn falls on my head than turning into prawn girl from TOTALLY DIFFERENT BIOLOGY JUICE. I know not everyone can be raised by a biologist, but I wish they would have paid attention in high school.

I also think agendas are more effective when subtly approached rather than when I'm slammed over the head in the first 5 minutes with the Trail of Tears.

Date: 2009-08-17 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bottleimp.livejournal.com
TOTALLY DIFFERENT BIOLOGY JUICE

I made some of that over vacation. Really good for hiking.

Date: 2009-08-17 04:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adaptively.livejournal.com
...but *really* difficult to get out of your sheets.

Date: 2009-08-17 04:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cinnabarine.livejournal.com
While I definitely enjoyed myself some movietimes all over District 9 tonight, I completely agree with you about the anti-science.

Date: 2009-08-17 03:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhimm.livejournal.com
Still get vaccines isn't the problem. At this point more and more people are voluntarily opting not to get them for their children.

I hear you 100% on this. I've read way too many well researched sci-fi novels to tolerate -easily- correctable crap in films. Hollywood -is- lazy and whether it is mindless entertainment or not, they're still -lazy-. And lazy has consequences when you're a multi-billion dollar a year industry.

Profile

opabinia: Herrenvolk (S04 E01) tag line (Default)
opabinia

February 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 11th, 2026 03:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios